Spring Individual Sports Schedules
Golf: Girls | Boys | iWanamaker Tennis: Girls | Boys | TennisReporting Track & Field: Girls | Boys | Athletic.net
Golf: Girls | Boys | iWanamaker Tennis: Girls | Boys | TennisReporting Track & Field: Girls | Boys | Athletic.net
2026 Softball Rankings
Click here for OSAAtoday Softball Articles
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 6-0 | 1 | 756.250 | 1 | 871.943 |
|
2 | 5-0 | 6 | 658.750 | 2 | 834.279 |
|
3 | 5-1 | 3 | 681.333 | 6 | 744.500 |
|
4 | 4-1 | 2 | 718.750 | 8 | 740.469 |
|
5 | 5-1 | 4 | 675.828 | 7 | 743.172 |
|
6 | 4-0 | 9 | 634.375 | 3 | 798.615 |
|
7 | 4-1 | 7 | 653.654 | 11 | 697.558 |
|
8 | 5-1 | 10 | 625.000 | 9 | 723.098 |
|
9 | 2-1 | 5 | 662.917 | 16 | 664.255 |
|
10 | 5-0 | 18 | 555.833 | 5 | 764.920 |
|
11 | 3-4 | 16 | 581.566 | 10 | 715.374 |
|
12 | 4-1 | 14 | 599.615 | 14 | 668.141 |
|
13 | 3-2 | 11 | 622.500 | 17 | 638.814 |
|
14 | 5-3 | 17 | 564.405 | 13 | 671.915 |
|
15 | 3-3 | 8 | 636.964 | 22 | 615.323 |
|
16 | 5-0 | 27 | 512.500 | 4 | 765.563 |
|
17 | 3-2 | 13 | 604.000 | 18 | 623.567 |
|
18 | 3-1-1 | 12 | 612.564 | 20 | 618.805 |
|
19 | 3-1-1 | 19 | 547.727 | 15 | 665.469 |
|
20 | 5-1 | 26 | 515.139 | 12 | 683.936 |
|
21 | 4-2 | 22 | 531.319 | 19 | 621.415 |
|
22 | 2-3 | 15 | 584.583 | 27 | 488.617 |
|
23 | 3-2 | 21 | 536.667 | 23 | 595.763 |
|
24 | 4-2 | 24 | 525.694 | 24 | 567.225 |
|
25 | 3-4 | 23 | 527.857 | 30 | 459.504 |
|
26 | 1-4 | 20 | 542.500 | 34 | 367.431 |
|
27 | 3-3 | 30 | 495.694 | 26 | 498.498 |
|
28 | 4-3 | 32 | 453.339 | 25 | 518.850 |
|
29 | 1-4 | 25 | 521.846 | 32 | 401.244 |
|
30 | 2-0 | 41 | 350.000 | 21 | 617.551 |
|
31 | 3-2 | 34 | 426.167 | 28 | 487.335 |
|
32 | 3-4 | 31 | 490.714 | 31 | 458.617 |
|
33 | 1-4 | 28 | 507.250 | 35 | 356.416 |
|
34 | 1-1 | 35 | 418.750 | 29 | 473.873 |
|
35 | 1-5 | 29 | 500.515 | 37 | 340.559 |
|
36 | 1-4 | 36 | 415.833 | 33 | 369.798 |
|
37 | 1-3 | 33 | 429.261 | 39 | 330.253 |
|
38 | 2-4 | 38 | 385.694 | 36 | 346.999 |
|
39 | 2-5 | 39 | 381.513 | 38 | 334.961 |
|
40 | 0-2 | 40 | 365.625 | 40 | 315.308 |
|
41 | 0-6 | 37 | 390.000 | 43 | 174.819 |
|
42 | 1-2 | 43 | 326.250 | 41 | 302.655 |
|
43 | 0-3-1 | 42 | 342.708 | 42 | 279.614 |
|
44 | 0-6 | 44 | 308.750 | 44 | 155.024 |
|
45 | 0-6 | 44 | 308.750 | 45 | 124.427 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 5-0 | 2 | 649.000 | 1 | 786.438 |
|
2 | 5-0 | 1 | 675.000 | 2 | 783.587 |
|
3 | 5-1 | 3 | 620.208 | 3 | 709.720 |
|
4 | 2-1 | 4 | 619.583 | 7 | 595.471 |
|
5 | 2-0 | 10 | 566.667 | 4 | 679.387 |
|
6 | 3-2 | 5 | 605.385 | 9 | 573.298 |
|
7 | 4-2 | 11 | 544.583 | 6 | 620.646 |
|
8 | 4-2 | 6 | 593.056 | 11 | 565.374 |
|
9 | 4-2 | 13 | 539.348 | 5 | 624.703 |
|
10 | 2-1 | 12 | 542.500 | 8 | 592.340 |
|
11 | 3-2 | 7 | 590.000 | 14 | 515.307 |
|
12 | 3-1 | 9 | 567.083 | 13 | 539.585 |
|
13 | 2-3 | 8 | 569.273 | 15 | 490.258 |
|
14 | 4-2 | 16 | 466.944 | 10 | 571.256 |
|
15 | 2-3 | 15 | 475.000 | 17 | 413.222 |
|
16 | 1-0 | 24 | 350.000 | 12 | 558.024 |
|
17 | 2-4 | 20 | 421.375 | 16 | 488.089 |
|
18 | 2-4 | 18 | 436.250 | 20 | 346.089 |
|
19 | 0-6 | 14 | 498.333 | 24 | 263.962 |
|
20 | 2-4 | 21 | 402.202 | 19 | 354.449 |
|
21 | 2-3 | 23 | 376.333 | 18 | 371.906 |
|
22 | 2-4 | 22 | 385.833 | 22 | 337.256 |
|
23 | 0-6 | 17 | 464.286 | 29 | 187.474 |
|
24 | 0-7 | 19 | 426.037 | 28 | 199.696 |
|
25 | 2-3 | 27 | 306.000 | 21 | 340.184 |
|
26 | 2-3 | 26 | 328.500 | 23 | 334.641 |
|
27 | 1-4 | 25 | 334.269 | 25 | 242.557 |
|
28 | 0-3 | 29 | 292.500 | 27 | 222.739 |
|
29 | 0-2 | 31 | 189.583 | 26 | 237.056 |
|
30 | 0-4 | 28 | 297.917 | 30 | 164.871 |
|
31 | 0-4 | 30 | 227.500 | 31 | 160.011 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 6-0 | 3 | 726.845 | 1 | 895.707 |
|
2 | 2-0 | 1 | 837.500 | 4 | 773.858 |
|
3 | 4-1 | 4 | 717.000 | 5 | 709.793 |
|
4 | 2-1 | 2 | 741.667 | 10 | 605.880 |
|
5 | 4-0 | 10 | 634.375 | 3 | 786.350 |
|
6 | 3-0 | 5 | 675.000 | 8 | 666.667 |
|
7 | 5-0 | 12 | 576.881 | 2 | 791.833 |
|
8 | 3-2 | 8 | 639.583 | 6 | 690.032 |
|
9 | 3-2 | 11 | 632.308 | 11 | 587.751 |
|
10 | 4-2 | 18 | 501.845 | 9 | 607.886 |
|
11 | 1-4 | 9 | 638.927 | 19 | 465.236 |
|
12 | 2-1 | 15 | 520.833 | 14 | 535.828 |
|
13 | 1-1 | 14 | 535.000 | 15 | 520.797 |
|
14 | 0-1 | 6 | 650.000 | 23 | 424.619 |
|
15 | 4-0 | 24 | 436.667 | 7 | 668.785 |
|
16 | 0-2 | 6 | 650.000 | 25 | 333.333 |
|
17 | 2-2 | 19 | 500.000 | 13 | 561.749 |
|
18 | 3-5 | 16 | 512.757 | 16 | 511.826 |
|
19 | 1-1 | 17 | 512.500 | 18 | 476.180 |
|
20 | 1-2 | 13 | 554.167 | 22 | 434.875 |
|
21 | 1-0 | 25 | 350.000 | 12 | 578.068 |
|
22 | 3-3 | 21 | 484.722 | 17 | 476.578 |
|
23 | 1-2 | 20 | 495.833 | 21 | 438.426 |
|
24 | 2-2 | 22 | 459.375 | 20 | 442.557 |
|
25 | 1-4 | 23 | 440.636 | 24 | 363.452 |
|
26 | 1-4 | 27 | 270.513 | 26 | 287.874 |
|
27 | 0-5 | 26 | 316.333 | 28 | 230.925 |
|
28 | 0-2 | 28 | 0.000 | 27 | 248.429 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 7-0 | 2 | 806.548 | 1 | 899.768 |
|
2 | 5-1 | 1 | 829.524 | 2 | 867.473 |
|
3 | 4-1 | 4 | 703.333 | 4 | 744.081 |
|
4 | 5-1 | 7 | 670.500 | 3 | 746.025 |
|
5 | 2-0 | 5 | 675.000 | 7 | 696.477 |
|
6 | 3-1 | 8 | 667.500 | 8 | 695.059 |
|
7 | 1-0 | 5 | 675.000 | 11 | 625.000 |
|
8 | 2-1 | 3 | 737.500 | 13 | 619.237 |
|
9 | 4-1 | 12 | 623.167 | 6 | 733.920 |
|
10 | 4-0 | 14 | 620.833 | 5 | 739.287 |
|
11 | 2-0 | 14 | 620.833 | 9 | 680.050 |
|
12 | 2-0 | 17 | 588.333 | 10 | 674.811 |
|
13 | 3-2 | 16 | 605.385 | 12 | 624.899 |
|
14 | 2-2 | 13 | 621.875 | 20 | 528.770 |
|
15 | 0-1 | 9 | 650.000 | 25 | 393.350 |
|
16 | 1-1 | 18 | 546.250 | 19 | 534.411 |
|
17 | 0-1 | 9 | 650.000 | 28 | 375.000 |
|
18 | 2-1 | 21 | 466.667 | 17 | 561.724 |
|
19 | 2-1 | 20 | 501.111 | 18 | 560.794 |
|
20 | 0-2 | 9 | 650.000 | 30 | 347.558 |
|
21 | 2-2 | 19 | 519.444 | 22 | 431.613 |
|
22 | 1-0 | 29 | 350.000 | 14 | 600.000 |
|
22 | 1-0 | 29 | 350.000 | 14 | 600.000 |
|
24 | 1-0 | 29 | 350.000 | 16 | 583.712 |
|
25 | 1-2 | 24 | 425.000 | 23 | 424.478 |
|
26 | 1-2 | 23 | 453.333 | 24 | 411.581 |
|
27 | 2-5 | 22 | 454.269 | 29 | 363.221 |
|
28 | 1-1 | 32 | 337.500 | 21 | 475.492 |
|
29 | 0-5 | 25 | 417.083 | 34 | 229.713 |
|
30 | 1-6 | 27 | 378.557 | 33 | 255.555 |
|
31 | 2-4 | 34 | 319.028 | 27 | 381.067 |
|
32 | 0-4 | 26 | 406.250 | 35 | 214.779 |
|
33 | 1-1 | 37 | 175.000 | 26 | 389.047 |
|
34 | 1-3 | 33 | 321.528 | 31 | 326.850 |
|
35 | 0-4 | 28 | 352.083 | 36 | 206.138 |
|
36 | 1-5 | 35 | 277.500 | 32 | 295.914 |
|
37 | 0-6 | 36 | 198.611 | 37 | 102.900 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 2-0 | 3 | 675.000 | 4 | 700.000 |
|
2 | 1-2 | 6 | 641.667 | 2 | 712.192 |
|
3 | 4-0 | 9 | 593.750 | 1 | 752.273 |
|
4 | 1-1 | 2 | 730.000 | 13 | 568.289 |
|
5 | 1-1 | 1 | 860.000 | 16 | 536.681 |
|
6 | 2-0 | 12 | 566.667 | 7 | 625.000 |
|
7 | 2-1 | 8 | 623.611 | 11 | 584.089 |
|
8 | 1-1 | 7 | 630.000 | 12 | 582.197 |
|
9 | 6-0 | 19 | 458.333 | 3 | 708.871 |
|
10 | 3-0 | 12 | 566.667 | 10 | 588.825 |
|
11 | 0-1 | 4 | 650.000 | 19 | 500.000 |
|
12 | 3-4 | 11 | 577.183 | 14 | 568.048 |
|
13 | 5-2 | 20 | 448.249 | 6 | 636.577 |
|
14 | 2-0 | 22 | 431.250 | 5 | 652.694 |
|
15 | 1-2 | 4 | 650.000 | 26 | 417.424 |
|
16 | 1-1 | 14 | 535.000 | 19 | 500.000 |
|
17 | 2-0 | 26 | 350.000 | 8 | 617.889 |
|
18 | 1-0 | 26 | 350.000 | 9 | 604.790 |
|
19 | 3-3 | 17 | 488.958 | 18 | 520.085 |
|
20 | 2-4 | 10 | 583.333 | 27 | 414.869 |
|
21 | 1-0 | 26 | 350.000 | 15 | 551.700 |
|
22 | 2-1 | 24 | 365.556 | 17 | 536.263 |
|
23 | 1-2 | 16 | 495.833 | 25 | 428.945 |
|
24 | 2-2 | 23 | 402.841 | 21 | 472.146 |
|
25 | 0-2 | 18 | 487.500 | 30 | 314.371 |
|
26 | 0-2 | 21 | 433.333 | 29 | 332.625 |
|
27 | 0-4 | 15 | 514.583 | 37 | 266.474 |
|
28 | 1-1 | 30 | 337.500 | 23 | 446.622 |
|
29 | 0-2 | 25 | 352.083 | 31 | 300.485 |
|
30 | 3-2 | 37 | 210.000 | 22 | 459.887 |
|
31 | 0-1 | 31 | 325.000 | 28 | 375.000 |
|
32 | 1-1 | 39 | 140.000 | 24 | 443.115 |
|
33 | 0-2 | 31 | 325.000 | 32 | 300.000 |
|
33 | 0-2 | 31 | 325.000 | 32 | 300.000 |
|
35 | 1-4 | 29 | 340.769 | 34 | 296.403 |
|
36 | 0-3 | 31 | 325.000 | 36 | 277.756 |
|
37 | 1-3 | 35 | 232.500 | 35 | 279.328 |
|
38 | 0-2 | 36 | 227.500 | 38 | 225.912 |
|
39 | 0-4 | 38 | 162.500 | 39 | 155.099 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
