Spring Individual Sports Schedules
Golf: Girls | Boys | iWanamaker Tennis: Girls | Boys | TennisReporting Track & Field: Girls | Boys | Athletic.net
Golf: Girls | Boys | iWanamaker Tennis: Girls | Boys | TennisReporting Track & Field: Girls | Boys | Athletic.net
2026 Softball Rankings
Click here for OSAAtoday Softball Articles
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 6-0 | 1 | 756.250 | 1 | 872.157 |
|
2 | 5-0 | 6 | 658.750 | 2 | 834.276 |
|
3 | 5-1 | 3 | 681.333 | 5 | 744.539 |
|
4 | 4-1 | 2 | 718.750 | 7 | 738.539 |
|
5 | 5-1 | 4 | 675.828 | 6 | 743.363 |
|
6 | 4-0 | 8 | 650.625 | 3 | 803.369 |
|
7 | 4-1 | 7 | 653.654 | 11 | 697.281 |
|
8 | 5-1 | 10 | 625.000 | 9 | 723.028 |
|
9 | 2-1 | 5 | 662.917 | 15 | 665.136 |
|
10 | 3-4 | 16 | 581.566 | 10 | 719.293 |
|
11 | 4-1 | 14 | 599.615 | 14 | 668.778 |
|
12 | 3-2 | 11 | 622.500 | 17 | 647.652 |
|
13 | 5-0 | 26 | 512.500 | 4 | 764.840 |
|
14 | 5-3 | 17 | 564.405 | 13 | 671.217 |
|
15 | 3-2 | 13 | 604.000 | 18 | 623.321 |
|
16 | 3-3 | 9 | 636.964 | 22 | 615.067 |
|
17 | 4-0 | 24 | 526.042 | 8 | 730.142 |
|
18 | 3-1-1 | 12 | 612.564 | 20 | 618.783 |
|
19 | 3-1-1 | 18 | 547.727 | 16 | 664.427 |
|
20 | 5-1 | 25 | 515.139 | 12 | 683.847 |
|
21 | 4-2 | 23 | 531.319 | 19 | 621.363 |
|
22 | 3-2 | 20 | 536.667 | 23 | 595.330 |
|
23 | 2-3 | 15 | 584.583 | 29 | 483.837 |
|
24 | 4-2 | 22 | 532.917 | 24 | 570.948 |
|
25 | 1-4 | 21 | 534.846 | 32 | 400.947 |
|
26 | 1-4 | 19 | 542.500 | 34 | 367.192 |
|
27 | 3-3 | 28 | 503.333 | 27 | 486.616 |
|
28 | 3-3 | 30 | 495.694 | 26 | 497.111 |
|
29 | 4-3 | 32 | 453.339 | 25 | 518.609 |
|
30 | 2-0 | 41 | 350.000 | 21 | 618.511 |
|
31 | 3-2 | 34 | 426.167 | 28 | 484.840 |
|
32 | 3-4 | 31 | 490.714 | 31 | 456.173 |
|
33 | 1-4 | 27 | 507.250 | 35 | 356.348 |
|
34 | 1-1 | 35 | 418.750 | 30 | 473.340 |
|
35 | 1-5 | 29 | 500.515 | 36 | 341.086 |
|
36 | 1-4 | 36 | 415.833 | 33 | 370.016 |
|
37 | 1-3 | 33 | 429.261 | 39 | 323.607 |
|
38 | 2-5 | 38 | 381.513 | 38 | 335.309 |
|
39 | 2-4 | 40 | 358.611 | 37 | 335.520 |
|
40 | 0-2 | 39 | 365.625 | 40 | 314.939 |
|
41 | 0-6 | 37 | 390.000 | 43 | 172.459 |
|
42 | 1-2 | 43 | 326.250 | 41 | 301.349 |
|
43 | 0-3-1 | 42 | 342.708 | 42 | 279.395 |
|
44 | 0-6 | 45 | 308.750 | 44 | 154.820 |
|
45 | 0-6 | 44 | 315.972 | 45 | 128.208 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 5-0 | 1 | 662.000 | 1 | 790.670 |
|
2 | 5-0 | 2 | 647.917 | 2 | 770.552 |
|
3 | 5-1 | 3 | 620.208 | 3 | 705.832 |
|
4 | 2-1 | 4 | 619.583 | 8 | 595.925 |
|
5 | 2-0 | 10 | 566.667 | 4 | 678.904 |
|
6 | 3-2 | 7 | 583.718 | 10 | 561.495 |
|
7 | 4-2 | 6 | 593.056 | 11 | 560.887 |
|
8 | 4-2 | 13 | 539.348 | 5 | 624.709 |
|
9 | 4-2 | 12 | 544.583 | 6 | 620.759 |
|
10 | 2-1 | 11 | 564.167 | 7 | 610.867 |
|
11 | 3-2 | 5 | 606.250 | 14 | 527.567 |
|
12 | 3-1 | 9 | 567.083 | 13 | 534.502 |
|
13 | 4-2 | 15 | 466.944 | 9 | 571.893 |
|
14 | 2-3 | 8 | 569.273 | 16 | 490.319 |
|
15 | 2-4 | 20 | 434.375 | 15 | 503.579 |
|
16 | 1-0 | 24 | 350.000 | 12 | 557.173 |
|
17 | 2-3 | 19 | 434.538 | 17 | 405.551 |
|
18 | 0-6 | 14 | 498.333 | 24 | 264.673 |
|
19 | 2-4 | 18 | 436.250 | 21 | 341.980 |
|
20 | 1-3 | 17 | 436.705 | 23 | 336.185 |
|
21 | 2-3 | 23 | 376.333 | 18 | 370.809 |
|
22 | 2-4 | 22 | 389.563 | 19 | 352.748 |
|
23 | 2-3 | 25 | 335.000 | 20 | 344.097 |
|
24 | 0-6 | 16 | 464.286 | 29 | 186.810 |
|
25 | 2-3 | 27 | 306.000 | 22 | 339.808 |
|
26 | 0-7 | 21 | 426.037 | 28 | 198.062 |
|
27 | 1-4 | 26 | 334.269 | 26 | 242.547 |
|
28 | 0-2 | 31 | 211.250 | 25 | 242.765 |
|
29 | 0-3 | 29 | 292.500 | 27 | 223.629 |
|
30 | 0-4 | 28 | 297.917 | 30 | 161.358 |
|
31 | 0-4 | 30 | 227.500 | 31 | 159.162 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 5-0 | 2 | 769.714 | 1 | 882.029 |
|
2 | 2-0 | 1 | 837.500 | 4 | 773.529 |
|
3 | 4-1 | 4 | 717.000 | 5 | 710.361 |
|
4 | 4-0 | 8 | 634.375 | 3 | 788.114 |
|
5 | 2-1 | 3 | 741.667 | 9 | 607.491 |
|
6 | 5-0 | 11 | 576.881 | 2 | 790.463 |
|
7 | 3-0 | 5 | 675.000 | 8 | 666.667 |
|
8 | 3-2 | 10 | 632.308 | 11 | 587.943 |
|
9 | 3-2 | 19 | 477.083 | 6 | 689.858 |
|
10 | 4-2 | 15 | 501.845 | 10 | 606.667 |
|
11 | 1-3 | 9 | 633.507 | 18 | 500.000 |
|
12 | 2-1 | 13 | 520.833 | 15 | 535.433 |
|
13 | 1-1 | 12 | 535.000 | 16 | 515.989 |
|
14 | 4-0 | 22 | 436.667 | 7 | 667.799 |
|
15 | 0-1 | 6 | 650.000 | 23 | 424.510 |
|
16 | 2-2 | 16 | 500.000 | 14 | 561.329 |
|
17 | 3-5 | 14 | 512.757 | 17 | 508.907 |
|
18 | 0-2 | 6 | 650.000 | 25 | 333.333 |
|
19 | 1-0 | 24 | 350.000 | 12 | 576.400 |
|
20 | 1-0 | 24 | 350.000 | 13 | 572.556 |
|
21 | 3-3 | 18 | 484.722 | 19 | 475.166 |
|
22 | 1-2 | 17 | 495.833 | 22 | 443.229 |
|
23 | 2-2 | 20 | 459.375 | 21 | 443.488 |
|
24 | 1-1 | 23 | 418.750 | 20 | 468.273 |
|
25 | 1-4 | 21 | 440.636 | 24 | 362.811 |
|
26 | 1-4 | 27 | 270.513 | 26 | 292.743 |
|
27 | 0-5 | 26 | 316.333 | 28 | 229.637 |
|
28 | 0-2 | 28 | 0.000 | 27 | 246.256 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 6-0 | 2 | 828.472 | 1 | 891.543 |
|
2 | 5-1 | 1 | 829.524 | 2 | 864.011 |
|
3 | 4-1 | 4 | 703.333 | 5 | 741.156 |
|
4 | 5-1 | 7 | 670.500 | 4 | 743.111 |
|
5 | 2-0 | 5 | 675.000 | 7 | 696.488 |
|
6 | 3-1 | 8 | 667.500 | 8 | 692.968 |
|
7 | 1-0 | 5 | 675.000 | 11 | 625.000 |
|
8 | 2-1 | 3 | 737.500 | 13 | 617.863 |
|
9 | 4-0 | 14 | 620.833 | 3 | 743.593 |
|
10 | 4-1 | 12 | 623.167 | 6 | 730.960 |
|
11 | 2-0 | 14 | 620.833 | 9 | 675.017 |
|
12 | 2-0 | 17 | 588.333 | 10 | 674.666 |
|
13 | 3-2 | 16 | 605.385 | 12 | 621.454 |
|
14 | 2-2 | 13 | 621.875 | 18 | 526.540 |
|
15 | 0-1 | 9 | 650.000 | 25 | 391.672 |
|
16 | 2-1 | 18 | 575.000 | 17 | 564.688 |
|
17 | 0-1 | 9 | 650.000 | 28 | 375.000 |
|
18 | 0-2 | 9 | 650.000 | 30 | 346.965 |
|
19 | 2-2 | 19 | 519.444 | 21 | 430.380 |
|
20 | 1-0 | 28 | 350.000 | 14 | 600.000 |
|
20 | 1-0 | 28 | 350.000 | 14 | 600.000 |
|
22 | 1-0 | 28 | 350.000 | 16 | 583.726 |
|
23 | 1-2 | 23 | 425.000 | 22 | 423.634 |
|
24 | 1-2 | 22 | 453.333 | 23 | 413.205 |
|
25 | 1-1 | 26 | 356.667 | 20 | 463.907 |
|
26 | 1-1 | 31 | 337.500 | 19 | 475.671 |
|
27 | 2-5 | 21 | 454.269 | 29 | 359.742 |
|
28 | 1-6 | 20 | 517.843 | 32 | 297.417 |
|
29 | 2-4 | 33 | 319.028 | 24 | 392.437 |
|
30 | 0-1 | 32 | 325.000 | 26 | 390.146 |
|
31 | 0-5 | 24 | 417.083 | 34 | 227.802 |
|
32 | 0-4 | 25 | 406.250 | 35 | 211.104 |
|
33 | 0-4 | 27 | 352.083 | 36 | 206.057 |
|
34 | 1-1 | 37 | 175.000 | 27 | 388.662 |
|
35 | 1-3 | 36 | 240.278 | 31 | 308.395 |
|
36 | 1-5 | 34 | 277.500 | 33 | 295.247 |
|
37 | 0-6 | 35 | 252.778 | 37 | 121.009 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 2-0 | 3 | 675.000 | 4 | 700.000 |
|
2 | 1-2 | 6 | 641.667 | 2 | 714.615 |
|
3 | 4-0 | 9 | 593.750 | 1 | 752.273 |
|
4 | 1-1 | 2 | 730.000 | 13 | 571.923 |
|
5 | 2-0 | 9 | 593.750 | 7 | 625.000 |
|
6 | 1-1 | 1 | 860.000 | 16 | 536.681 |
|
7 | 2-1 | 8 | 623.611 | 11 | 584.089 |
|
8 | 1-1 | 7 | 630.000 | 12 | 582.197 |
|
9 | 6-0 | 19 | 458.333 | 3 | 708.871 |
|
10 | 3-0 | 13 | 566.667 | 10 | 588.825 |
|
11 | 0-1 | 4 | 650.000 | 20 | 500.000 |
|
12 | 5-2 | 20 | 448.249 | 6 | 643.846 |
|
13 | 3-4 | 12 | 577.183 | 14 | 568.048 |
|
14 | 2-0 | 22 | 431.250 | 5 | 652.694 |
|
15 | 1-1 | 4 | 650.000 | 26 | 417.424 |
|
16 | 2-0 | 26 | 350.000 | 8 | 617.889 |
|
17 | 1-1 | 14 | 535.000 | 20 | 500.000 |
|
18 | 1-0 | 26 | 350.000 | 9 | 604.790 |
|
19 | 3-3 | 17 | 488.958 | 19 | 524.624 |
|
20 | 2-4 | 11 | 583.333 | 27 | 414.869 |
|
21 | 1-0 | 26 | 350.000 | 15 | 551.700 |
|
22 | 2-1 | 24 | 365.556 | 17 | 536.263 |
|
23 | 1-2 | 16 | 495.833 | 25 | 428.945 |
|
24 | 2-2 | 23 | 402.841 | 22 | 472.146 |
|
25 | 0-2 | 18 | 487.500 | 30 | 314.371 |
|
26 | 0-2 | 21 | 433.333 | 29 | 332.625 |
|
27 | 0-4 | 15 | 514.583 | 37 | 266.474 |
|
28 | 1-1 | 30 | 337.500 | 23 | 446.622 |
|
29 | 3-1 | 36 | 262.500 | 18 | 530.916 |
|
30 | 0-2 | 25 | 352.083 | 31 | 300.485 |
|
31 | 0-1 | 31 | 325.000 | 28 | 375.000 |
|
32 | 1-1 | 39 | 140.000 | 24 | 443.115 |
|
33 | 0-2 | 31 | 325.000 | 32 | 300.000 |
|
33 | 0-2 | 31 | 325.000 | 32 | 300.000 |
|
35 | 1-4 | 29 | 340.769 | 34 | 296.403 |
|
36 | 0-3 | 31 | 325.000 | 36 | 277.756 |
|
37 | 1-3 | 37 | 232.500 | 35 | 279.328 |
|
38 | 0-2 | 35 | 281.667 | 38 | 246.391 |
|
39 | 0-4 | 38 | 162.500 | 39 | 155.099 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
