Spring Individual Sports Schedules
Golf: Girls | Boys | iWanamaker Tennis: Girls | Boys | TennisReporting Track & Field: Girls | Boys | Athletic.net
Golf: Girls | Boys | iWanamaker Tennis: Girls | Boys | TennisReporting Track & Field: Girls | Boys | Athletic.net
2026 Baseball Rankings
Click here for OSAAtoday Baseball Articles
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 3-1 | 1 | 922.222 | 5 | 740.573 |
|
2 | 4-1 | 4 | 729.487 | 4 | 751.834 |
|
3 | 2-4 | 8 | 668.750 | 1 | 788.537 |
|
4 | 3-1 | 3 | 753.958 | 7 | 721.719 |
|
5 | 5-1 | 9 | 668.056 | 3 | 754.613 |
|
6 | 4-0 | 12 | 620.833 | 2 | 771.595 |
|
7 | 3-2 | 5 | 707.883 | 9 | 684.426 |
|
8 | 3-2 | 7 | 675.561 | 11 | 642.915 |
|
9 | 3-2 | 2 | 772.917 | 21 | 542.700 |
|
10 | 2-2 | 10 | 654.583 | 14 | 590.059 |
|
11 | 5-1 | 21 | 516.667 | 6 | 728.339 |
|
12 | 2-1 | 14 | 587.083 | 13 | 592.557 |
|
13 | 4-1 | 13 | 604.904 | 15 | 582.809 |
|
14 | 3-1 | 22 | 515.833 | 10 | 672.710 |
|
15 | 2-2 | 15 | 564.659 | 19 | 559.411 |
|
16 | 2-5 | 19 | 531.429 | 17 | 564.823 |
|
17 | 2-2 | 6 | 697.500 | 32 | 417.278 |
|
18 | 1-0 | 26 | 480.000 | 16 | 581.634 |
|
19 | 2-2 | 18 | 534.722 | 24 | 521.430 |
|
20 | 2-3 | 20 | 522.689 | 25 | 513.495 |
|
21 | 4-2 | 17 | 550.000 | 28 | 479.788 |
|
22 | 4-2 | 38 | 387.500 | 8 | 687.439 |
|
23 | 2-1-1 | 11 | 626.290 | 35 | 375.000 |
|
24 | 2-3 | 29 | 438.952 | 18 | 561.463 |
|
25 | 2-4 | 25 | 489.106 | 22 | 539.103 |
|
26 | 2-2 | 24 | 496.185 | 23 | 528.685 |
|
27 | 2-3 | 16 | 551.538 | 34 | 395.813 |
|
28 | 4-2 | 34 | 404.931 | 20 | 543.699 |
|
29 | 0-4 | 28 | 443.135 | 26 | 500.000 |
|
30 | 2-2 | 23 | 502.500 | 31 | 440.261 |
|
31 | 0-4 | 31 | 432.083 | 26 | 500.000 |
|
32 | 1-4 | 46 | 279.312 | 12 | 610.822 |
|
33 | 3-3 | 30 | 437.917 | 29 | 473.414 |
|
34 | 2-2 | 35 | 394.861 | 30 | 462.274 |
|
35 | 1-3 | 33 | 406.913 | 37 | 362.681 |
|
36 | 2-2-1 | 39 | 383.381 | 33 | 415.951 |
|
37 | 2-3 | 27 | 461.881 | 46 | 228.419 |
|
38 | 0-1 | 36 | 390.000 | 39 | 326.596 |
|
39 | 1-5 | 32 | 408.607 | 43 | 244.901 |
|
40 | 0-1 | 44 | 325.000 | 35 | 375.000 |
|
41 | 1-3 | 40 | 367.917 | 40 | 321.595 |
|
42 | 2-4 | 43 | 336.875 | 38 | 340.079 |
|
43 | 0-2 | 41 | 357.500 | 42 | 260.929 |
|
44 | 0-4 | 37 | 388.646 | 47 | 196.653 |
|
45 | 0-4 | 42 | 338.542 | 45 | 234.055 |
|
46 | 0-1 | 47 | 0.000 | 41 | 273.865 |
|
47 | 1-4 | 45 | 322.955 | 44 | 234.933 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 4-1 | 5 | 627.500 | 2 | 725.308 |
|
2 | 3-1 | 3 | 676.875 | 4 | 719.289 |
|
3 | 3-2 | 10 | 541.544 | 1 | 727.418 |
|
4 | 1-0 | 4 | 675.000 | 7 | 625.000 |
|
5 | 3-1 | 7 | 561.667 | 6 | 646.958 |
|
6 | 2-2 | 8 | 551.250 | 7 | 625.000 |
|
7 | 3-2 | 6 | 605.385 | 10 | 588.971 |
|
8 | 1-3 | 1 | 766.667 | 20 | 423.904 |
|
9 | 3-1 | 14 | 506.250 | 9 | 590.399 |
|
10 | 2-2 | 2 | 695.000 | 21 | 418.284 |
|
11 | 3-2 | 12 | 521.326 | 12 | 580.338 |
|
12 | 2-3 | 22 | 419.091 | 3 | 719.653 |
|
13 | 2-2 | 11 | 527.083 | 16 | 553.503 |
|
14 | 2-2 | 23 | 411.190 | 5 | 667.972 |
|
15 | 3-1 | 13 | 520.035 | 15 | 562.580 |
|
16 | 1-2-1 | 9 | 549.034 | 21 | 418.284 |
|
17 | 2-3-1 | 15 | 501.143 | 18 | 466.560 |
|
18 | 4-1 | 20 | 438.030 | 14 | 568.569 |
|
19 | 2-2-1 | 17 | 469.083 | 17 | 502.423 |
|
20 | 4-1 | 24 | 410.000 | 11 | 583.842 |
|
21 | 1-1 | 18 | 465.000 | 19 | 464.286 |
|
22 | 3-1 | 26 | 286.364 | 13 | 571.969 |
|
23 | 1-2-1 | 16 | 482.500 | 24 | 360.113 |
|
24 | 1-3 | 21 | 422.083 | 23 | 392.916 |
|
25 | 0-5 | 19 | 455.000 | 25 | 353.884 |
|
26 | 1-3 | 27 | 267.361 | 26 | 351.206 |
|
27 | 0-2 | 31 | 81.250 | 27 | 332.633 |
|
28 | 0-3 | 25 | 352.083 | 33 | 201.010 |
|
29 | 1-2 | 28 | 203.472 | 31 | 278.199 |
|
30 | 0-1 | 32 | 0.000 | 28 | 321.429 |
|
31 | 0-5 | 30 | 130.000 | 30 | 280.632 |
|
32 | 0-2 | 32 | 0.000 | 29 | 309.224 |
|
33 | 0-2 | 29 | 173.333 | 32 | 201.817 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 4-1 | 1 | 946.154 | 2 | 801.551 |
|
2 | 3-0 | 2 | 891.667 | 3 | 800.200 |
|
3 | 3-2 | 4 | 702.885 | 4 | 752.820 |
|
4 | 5-1 | 9 | 611.389 | 1 | 821.773 |
|
5 | 4-1 | 7 | 654.697 | 5 | 701.169 |
|
6 | 1-1 | 5 | 697.500 | 10 | 587.952 |
|
7 | 2-0 | 10 | 593.750 | 6 | 692.174 |
|
8 | 3-2 | 6 | 665.000 | 12 | 556.044 |
|
9 | 1-3-1 | 11 | 587.500 | 8 | 642.410 |
|
10 | 5-1 | 14 | 541.013 | 9 | 598.989 |
|
11 | 2-2 | 8 | 635.417 | 15 | 507.236 |
|
12 | 3-2 | 13 | 554.227 | 11 | 559.623 |
|
13 | 2-2 | 12 | 562.500 | 13 | 540.836 |
|
14 | 2-0 | 21 | 458.333 | 7 | 666.574 |
|
15 | 1-2 | 3 | 750.000 | 26 | 375.000 |
|
16 | 2-2 | 16 | 524.375 | 18 | 458.889 |
|
17 | 2-2 | 18 | 480.833 | 17 | 484.777 |
|
18 | 3-1 | 22 | 421.181 | 14 | 537.012 |
|
19 | 2-3 | 17 | 491.500 | 19 | 458.094 |
|
20 | 3-2 | 19 | 470.833 | 20 | 435.071 |
|
21 | 2-6 | 15 | 528.788 | 24 | 395.749 |
|
22 | 2-3 | 20 | 463.106 | 21 | 430.833 |
|
23 | 0-1 | 30 | 0.000 | 16 | 500.000 |
|
24 | 1-2 | 25 | 347.917 | 23 | 414.338 |
|
25 | 1-3 | 24 | 398.958 | 25 | 375.208 |
|
26 | 1-2 | 28 | 316.667 | 22 | 423.328 |
|
27 | 1-3 | 23 | 402.917 | 27 | 353.240 |
|
28 | 0-3 | 27 | 325.000 | 29 | 212.650 |
|
29 | 1-6 | 26 | 345.744 | 30 | 131.074 |
|
30 | 0-4 | 29 | 270.833 | 28 | 242.188 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 2-0 | 1 | 1000.000 | 3 | 784.415 |
|
2 | 3-0 | 4 | 819.444 | 1 | 852.352 |
|
3 | 3-0 | 5 | 783.333 | 2 | 797.017 |
|
4 | 1-1 | 3 | 825.000 | 10 | 625.000 |
|
5 | 4-1 | 10 | 644.545 | 4 | 740.507 |
|
6 | 2-0 | 11 | 620.833 | 5 | 709.329 |
|
7 | 1-0 | 7 | 675.000 | 9 | 637.431 |
|
8 | 1-0 | 7 | 675.000 | 10 | 625.000 |
|
9 | 1-1 | 2 | 860.000 | 15 | 579.038 |
|
10 | 4-1 | 16 | 556.667 | 7 | 692.218 |
|
11 | 4-1 | 20 | 481.500 | 6 | 696.588 |
|
12 | 2-1 | 13 | 594.444 | 13 | 586.477 |
|
13 | 1-1 | 9 | 662.500 | 19 | 551.184 |
|
14 | 3-2 | 18 | 512.917 | 12 | 589.866 |
|
15 | 1-1 | 15 | 581.250 | 18 | 563.204 |
|
16 | 1-3 | 6 | 755.000 | 28 | 450.821 |
|
17 | 2-4 | 27 | 423.526 | 8 | 676.950 |
|
18 | 3-2 | 17 | 541.909 | 22 | 532.517 |
|
19 | 2-3 | 12 | 600.833 | 27 | 460.551 |
|
20 | 3-1 | 26 | 448.864 | 16 | 572.100 |
|
21 | 3-2 | 21 | 463.500 | 21 | 538.520 |
|
22 | 4-2 | 31 | 362.500 | 14 | 580.361 |
|
23 | 0-2 | 14 | 585.000 | 33 | 382.969 |
|
24 | 3-2 | 28 | 420.295 | 20 | 544.974 |
|
25 | 3-2 | 25 | 449.385 | 23 | 518.159 |
|
26 | 1-0 | 32 | 350.000 | 17 | 568.218 |
|
27 | 2-4 | 30 | 401.250 | 25 | 489.583 |
|
28 | 2-3 | 24 | 455.667 | 31 | 412.294 |
|
29 | 1-3 | 23 | 456.944 | 32 | 403.601 |
|
30 | 2-1 | 19 | 487.374 | 36 | 324.049 |
|
31 | 2-4 | 29 | 403.750 | 29 | 425.803 |
|
32 | 2-2 | 35 | 318.333 | 26 | 481.656 |
|
33 | 0-4 | 22 | 463.125 | 39 | 281.552 |
|
34 | 1-2 | 33 | 333.333 | 30 | 420.320 |
|
35 | 0-1 | 41 | 0.000 | 24 | 500.000 |
|
36 | 1-2 | 37 | 261.250 | 34 | 348.412 |
|
37 | 1-5 | 34 | 331.042 | 38 | 281.998 |
|
38 | 1-2 | 38 | 225.000 | 37 | 290.342 |
|
39 | 0-1 | 41 | 0.000 | 35 | 326.351 |
|
40 | 0-4 | 36 | 297.917 | 42 | 186.770 |
|
41 | 0-2 | 39 | 162.500 | 40 | 216.643 |
|
42 | 0-2 | 40 | 108.333 | 41 | 205.941 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 3-0 | 3 | 812.222 | 2 | 852.969 |
|
2 | 4-0 | 2 | 905.208 | 3 | 835.535 |
|
3 | 3-0 | 1 | 945.833 | 4 | 803.971 |
|
4 | 6-0 | 6 | 700.278 | 1 | 856.125 |
|
5 | 2-0 | 8 | 675.000 | 5 | 711.336 |
|
6 | 3-1 | 7 | 678.472 | 6 | 698.853 |
|
7 | 1-1 | 4 | 751.667 | 11 | 599.019 |
|
8 | 1-0 | 8 | 675.000 | 8 | 647.188 |
|
9 | 1-0 | 8 | 675.000 | 9 | 625.000 |
|
10 | 2-1 | 5 | 720.833 | 15 | 538.592 |
|
11 | 4-2 | 13 | 639.444 | 13 | 586.122 |
|
12 | 1-2 | 11 | 658.333 | 17 | 500.944 |
|
13 | 4-2 | 21 | 511.250 | 10 | 615.005 |
|
14 | 3-2 | 17 | 535.000 | 14 | 545.022 |
|
15 | 4-1 | 25 | 457.500 | 7 | 668.349 |
|
16 | 1-2 | 18 | 533.333 | 19 | 487.416 |
|
17 | 1-2 | 14 | 583.333 | 23 | 442.700 |
|
18 | 1-2 | 14 | 583.333 | 24 | 441.565 |
|
19 | 0-1 | 12 | 650.000 | 27 | 403.779 |
|
20 | 1-1 | 24 | 465.000 | 16 | 505.776 |
|
21 | 2-3 | 20 | 518.500 | 20 | 487.051 |
|
22 | 1-3 | 29 | 412.500 | 12 | 586.678 |
|
23 | 1-2 | 19 | 520.833 | 22 | 453.463 |
|
24 | 1-3 | 16 | 576.250 | 26 | 421.238 |
|
25 | 3-1 | 27 | 425.000 | 18 | 497.642 |
|
26 | 2-2 | 26 | 435.000 | 21 | 466.303 |
|
27 | 0-2 | 22 | 487.500 | 28 | 399.074 |
|
28 | 0-1 | 22 | 487.500 | 29 | 376.945 |
|
29 | 0-3 | 28 | 415.278 | 29 | 376.945 |
|
30 | 1-5 | 38 | 308.333 | 25 | 425.572 |
|
31 | 0-1 | 33 | 325.000 | 31 | 375.000 |
|
31 | 0-1 | 33 | 325.000 | 31 | 375.000 |
|
33 | 1-1 | 33 | 325.000 | 34 | 348.341 |
|
34 | 0-1 | 33 | 325.000 | 35 | 343.750 |
|
35 | 1-1 | 32 | 329.583 | 36 | 325.500 |
|
36 | 0-2 | 31 | 357.500 | 37 | 318.240 |
|
37 | 1-1 | 39 | 302.500 | 31 | 375.000 |
|
38 | 1-4 | 30 | 408.958 | 42 | 254.076 |
|
39 | 0-2 | 33 | 325.000 | 43 | 213.968 |
|
40 | 0-2 | 40 | 297.917 | 38 | 281.830 |
|
41 | 0-3 | 41 | 288.889 | 39 | 266.797 |
|
42 | 0-2 | 42 | 216.667 | 40 | 265.625 |
|
43 | 0-2 | 44 | 0.000 | 41 | 260.035 |
|
44 | 0-4 | 43 | 162.500 | 44 | 163.653 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
