Spring Individual Sports Schedules
Golf: Girls | Boys | iWanamaker Tennis: Girls | Boys | TennisReporting Track & Field: Girls | Boys | Athletic.net
Golf: Girls | Boys | iWanamaker Tennis: Girls | Boys | TennisReporting Track & Field: Girls | Boys | Athletic.net
2026 Softball Rankings
Click here for OSAAtoday Softball Articles
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 6-0 | 1 | 740.000 | 1 | 862.886 |
|
2 | 5-0 | 6 | 658.750 | 2 | 834.804 |
|
3 | 5-1 | 3 | 681.333 | 6 | 743.373 |
|
4 | 4-1 | 2 | 718.750 | 7 | 742.831 |
|
5 | 4-0 | 9 | 634.375 | 3 | 798.338 |
|
6 | 5-1 | 4 | 675.828 | 8 | 741.359 |
|
7 | 4-1 | 7 | 653.654 | 11 | 696.737 |
|
8 | 5-1 | 10 | 619.583 | 9 | 718.934 |
|
9 | 2-1 | 5 | 662.917 | 16 | 663.942 |
|
10 | 5-0 | 20 | 555.833 | 5 | 763.517 |
|
11 | 3-4 | 16 | 581.566 | 10 | 715.302 |
|
12 | 4-1 | 14 | 599.615 | 15 | 666.465 |
|
13 | 3-3 | 12 | 609.167 | 17 | 637.318 |
|
14 | 5-3 | 17 | 564.405 | 13 | 673.080 |
|
15 | 3-3 | 8 | 636.964 | 22 | 614.915 |
|
16 | 5-0 | 27 | 519.000 | 4 | 769.045 |
|
17 | 3-2 | 13 | 604.000 | 18 | 627.187 |
|
18 | 3-1-1 | 11 | 612.564 | 20 | 619.618 |
|
19 | 5-1 | 23 | 540.417 | 12 | 696.250 |
|
20 | 3-1-1 | 21 | 547.727 | 14 | 666.685 |
|
21 | 3-2 | 19 | 556.167 | 23 | 608.823 |
|
22 | 4-2 | 18 | 561.806 | 24 | 575.367 |
|
23 | 4-2 | 24 | 531.319 | 19 | 620.439 |
|
24 | 2-3 | 15 | 584.583 | 28 | 490.183 |
|
25 | 2-4 | 22 | 547.500 | 32 | 445.680 |
|
26 | 3-4 | 25 | 527.857 | 31 | 460.292 |
|
27 | 4-3 | 33 | 453.339 | 25 | 516.764 |
|
28 | 3-2 | 32 | 458.667 | 26 | 494.414 |
|
29 | 3-3 | 31 | 495.694 | 27 | 491.591 |
|
30 | 3-4 | 28 | 513.929 | 30 | 467.713 |
|
31 | 1-4 | 26 | 521.846 | 33 | 400.932 |
|
32 | 2-0 | 41 | 350.000 | 21 | 617.384 |
|
33 | 1-1 | 34 | 418.750 | 29 | 475.188 |
|
34 | 1-4 | 29 | 507.250 | 35 | 358.855 |
|
35 | 1-5 | 30 | 500.515 | 37 | 339.893 |
|
36 | 1-4 | 35 | 415.833 | 34 | 369.972 |
|
37 | 2-4 | 36 | 412.778 | 36 | 357.568 |
|
38 | 2-5 | 39 | 381.513 | 38 | 333.130 |
|
39 | 1-3 | 37 | 402.178 | 40 | 317.141 |
|
40 | 0-2 | 40 | 365.625 | 39 | 318.877 |
|
41 | 0-6 | 38 | 390.000 | 43 | 176.068 |
|
42 | 0-3-1 | 42 | 342.708 | 41 | 280.101 |
|
43 | 1-3 | 45 | 241.705 | 42 | 217.751 |
|
44 | 0-6 | 43 | 308.750 | 44 | 157.921 |
|
45 | 0-6 | 43 | 308.750 | 45 | 122.930 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 5-0 | 2 | 649.000 | 1 | 790.034 |
|
2 | 5-0 | 1 | 675.000 | 2 | 783.752 |
|
3 | 5-1 | 3 | 647.292 | 3 | 720.473 |
|
4 | 2-1 | 6 | 583.472 | 8 | 580.275 |
|
5 | 4-2 | 5 | 593.056 | 9 | 578.193 |
|
6 | 3-2 | 4 | 605.385 | 10 | 574.318 |
|
7 | 4-2 | 10 | 539.348 | 5 | 623.583 |
|
8 | 4-2 | 9 | 544.583 | 6 | 619.629 |
|
9 | 3-0 | 13 | 494.444 | 4 | 663.008 |
|
10 | 2-1 | 14 | 493.333 | 7 | 592.103 |
|
11 | 3-1 | 8 | 567.083 | 13 | 554.904 |
|
12 | 3-2 | 7 | 573.750 | 14 | 515.315 |
|
13 | 2-4 | 11 | 533.803 | 16 | 432.299 |
|
14 | 4-2 | 17 | 456.111 | 11 | 563.006 |
|
15 | 2-3 | 15 | 475.000 | 17 | 415.383 |
|
16 | 2-4 | 21 | 399.708 | 15 | 487.736 |
|
17 | 1-0 | 25 | 350.000 | 12 | 558.656 |
|
18 | 0-6 | 12 | 498.333 | 25 | 261.855 |
|
19 | 2-4 | 20 | 402.202 | 19 | 356.710 |
|
20 | 2-4 | 18 | 436.250 | 21 | 345.064 |
|
21 | 2-3 | 23 | 376.333 | 18 | 374.039 |
|
22 | 2-4 | 22 | 385.833 | 22 | 337.826 |
|
23 | 0-6 | 16 | 464.286 | 30 | 190.025 |
|
24 | 2-3 | 27 | 332.000 | 20 | 349.530 |
|
25 | 1-3 | 24 | 370.417 | 24 | 305.613 |
|
26 | 0-7 | 19 | 426.037 | 29 | 197.499 |
|
27 | 2-3 | 28 | 328.500 | 23 | 335.358 |
|
28 | 1-4 | 26 | 334.269 | 26 | 244.081 |
|
29 | 1-4 | 29 | 319.103 | 28 | 232.999 |
|
30 | 0-2 | 31 | 189.583 | 27 | 237.772 |
|
31 | 0-6 | 30 | 260.000 | 31 | 101.590 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 8-0 | 1 | 760.893 | 1 | 966.676 |
|
2 | 5-1 | 2 | 721.749 | 2 | 834.904 |
|
3 | 4-1 | 3 | 717.000 | 6 | 711.596 |
|
4 | 5-0 | 7 | 576.881 | 3 | 792.767 |
|
5 | 4-0 | 6 | 634.375 | 4 | 785.962 |
|
6 | 2-1 | 4 | 705.556 | 9 | 611.990 |
|
7 | 3-2 | 9 | 548.833 | 5 | 717.606 |
|
8 | 3-2 | 5 | 675.641 | 11 | 588.821 |
|
9 | 3-5 | 8 | 573.281 | 12 | 576.203 |
|
10 | 4-2 | 14 | 501.845 | 10 | 602.199 |
|
11 | 2-1 | 10 | 520.833 | 15 | 534.326 |
|
12 | 3-0 | 20 | 458.333 | 8 | 614.189 |
|
13 | 2-2 | 15 | 500.000 | 14 | 561.789 |
|
14 | 3-5 | 13 | 512.757 | 16 | 518.262 |
|
15 | 2-2 | 12 | 519.444 | 17 | 513.618 |
|
16 | 4-0 | 23 | 436.667 | 7 | 666.869 |
|
17 | 0-1 | 11 | 520.000 | 20 | 444.968 |
|
18 | 3-3 | 17 | 484.722 | 18 | 484.003 |
|
19 | 1-2 | 16 | 495.833 | 21 | 436.140 |
|
20 | 1-0 | 25 | 350.000 | 13 | 575.653 |
|
21 | 2-2 | 19 | 459.375 | 19 | 445.554 |
|
22 | 2-4 | 18 | 464.633 | 22 | 427.263 |
|
23 | 1-1-1 | 24 | 370.000 | 23 | 418.532 |
|
24 | 1-4 | 22 | 440.636 | 25 | 361.625 |
|
25 | 0-6 | 21 | 450.744 | 28 | 228.378 |
|
26 | 2-4 | 28 | 273.333 | 24 | 390.491 |
|
27 | 1-4 | 27 | 296.513 | 26 | 286.103 |
|
28 | 0-5 | 26 | 316.333 | 27 | 237.002 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 3-0 | 1 | 963.889 | 1 | 892.462 |
|
2 | 5-1 | 3 | 829.524 | 2 | 865.900 |
|
3 | 8-1 | 4 | 728.436 | 3 | 839.964 |
|
4 | 4-1 | 6 | 694.667 | 4 | 766.787 |
|
5 | 4-2 | 2 | 859.375 | 10 | 688.780 |
|
6 | 2-0 | 7 | 675.000 | 7 | 696.817 |
|
7 | 4-0 | 10 | 622.768 | 5 | 740.716 |
|
8 | 5-1 | 9 | 627.167 | 6 | 714.157 |
|
9 | 2-1 | 5 | 710.417 | 13 | 627.718 |
|
10 | 3-1 | 12 | 613.333 | 8 | 694.077 |
|
11 | 4-0 | 14 | 558.929 | 9 | 690.616 |
|
12 | 5-2 | 13 | 560.754 | 11 | 654.584 |
|
13 | 2-0 | 16 | 534.167 | 12 | 644.548 |
|
14 | 2-2 | 11 | 620.180 | 19 | 526.926 |
|
15 | 3-2 | 15 | 556.635 | 16 | 572.652 |
|
16 | 3-2 | 17 | 519.188 | 18 | 550.604 |
|
17 | 2-1 | 20 | 455.357 | 17 | 562.371 |
|
18 | 0-2 | 8 | 650.000 | 30 | 347.226 |
|
19 | 4-3 | 23 | 440.060 | 20 | 525.928 |
|
20 | 2-3 | 19 | 486.310 | 24 | 440.424 |
|
21 | 2-2 | 18 | 514.608 | 25 | 418.643 |
|
22 | 1-0 | 31 | 350.000 | 14 | 587.132 |
|
23 | 1-0 | 31 | 350.000 | 15 | 584.136 |
|
24 | 3-3 | 24 | 433.403 | 22 | 462.622 |
|
25 | 1-2 | 21 | 453.333 | 26 | 410.147 |
|
26 | 2-2 | 27 | 403.513 | 23 | 458.452 |
|
27 | 2-5 | 22 | 442.662 | 29 | 360.287 |
|
28 | 1-1 | 33 | 337.500 | 21 | 481.084 |
|
29 | 1-2 | 28 | 388.889 | 27 | 386.218 |
|
30 | 0-5 | 25 | 417.083 | 34 | 223.002 |
|
31 | 1-3 | 30 | 359.444 | 31 | 320.035 |
|
32 | 0-4 | 26 | 406.250 | 36 | 213.342 |
|
33 | 2-4 | 35 | 319.028 | 28 | 371.028 |
|
34 | 0-4 | 29 | 379.167 | 37 | 206.473 |
|
35 | 1-4 | 34 | 323.636 | 33 | 248.578 |
|
36 | 1-5 | 37 | 277.500 | 32 | 291.742 |
|
37 | 1-6 | 36 | 294.986 | 35 | 218.590 |
|
38 | 0-6 | 38 | 205.060 | 38 | 61.202 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 5-1 | 4 | 663.036 | 2 | 736.927 |
|
2 | 2-0 | 3 | 675.000 | 6 | 685.397 |
|
3 | 4-0 | 9 | 593.750 | 1 | 742.820 |
|
4 | 1-2 | 7 | 641.667 | 5 | 709.153 |
|
5 | 3-0 | 11 | 566.667 | 4 | 709.646 |
|
6 | 1-1 | 2 | 730.000 | 14 | 563.730 |
|
7 | 1-1 | 1 | 860.000 | 17 | 536.681 |
|
8 | 4-1 | 8 | 608.159 | 11 | 592.933 |
|
9 | 1-1 | 10 | 589.375 | 12 | 575.764 |
|
10 | 6-0 | 22 | 458.333 | 3 | 709.896 |
|
11 | 3-1 | 12 | 558.333 | 13 | 569.367 |
|
12 | 0-1 | 5 | 650.000 | 23 | 500.000 |
|
13 | 5-2 | 23 | 448.249 | 8 | 627.459 |
|
14 | 1-2 | 5 | 650.000 | 26 | 414.273 |
|
15 | 2-0 | 25 | 431.250 | 7 | 651.220 |
|
16 | 3-4 | 16 | 516.825 | 16 | 550.799 |
|
17 | 2-1 | 13 | 541.071 | 20 | 529.571 |
|
18 | 2-1 | 18 | 497.222 | 18 | 536.566 |
|
19 | 1-1 | 14 | 535.000 | 22 | 503.215 |
|
20 | 2-0 | 29 | 350.000 | 9 | 617.889 |
|
21 | 1-0 | 29 | 350.000 | 10 | 604.656 |
|
22 | 3-3 | 19 | 488.958 | 21 | 514.391 |
|
23 | 2-2-1 | 17 | 514.424 | 24 | 489.237 |
|
24 | 2-4 | 15 | 518.333 | 27 | 388.525 |
|
25 | 1-0 | 29 | 350.000 | 15 | 551.769 |
|
26 | 2-1 | 27 | 365.556 | 19 | 532.386 |
|
27 | 0-2 | 20 | 487.500 | 31 | 313.969 |
|
28 | 0-2 | 24 | 433.333 | 30 | 316.038 |
|
29 | 0-4 | 21 | 473.958 | 36 | 265.594 |
|
30 | 2-6 | 26 | 396.250 | 33 | 296.168 |
|
31 | 3-5 | 35 | 319.792 | 28 | 370.794 |
|
32 | 1-4 | 36 | 280.903 | 29 | 335.143 |
|
33 | 0-2 | 33 | 325.000 | 32 | 303.215 |
|
34 | 2-1 | 41 | 140.000 | 25 | 443.115 |
|
35 | 1-4 | 32 | 340.769 | 34 | 290.910 |
|
36 | 0-3 | 28 | 355.952 | 38 | 241.799 |
|
37 | 0-3 | 33 | 325.000 | 35 | 277.756 |
|
38 | 0-2 | 37 | 270.833 | 37 | 258.103 |
|
39 | 2-6 | 38 | 268.155 | 40 | 199.853 |
|
40 | 0-2 | 40 | 157.857 | 39 | 200.225 |
|
41 | 0-4 | 39 | 243.750 | 41 | 155.307 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
