Spring Individual Sports Schedules
Golf: Girls | Boys | iWanamaker Tennis: Girls | Boys | TennisReporting Track & Field: Girls | Boys | Athletic.net
Golf: Girls | Boys | iWanamaker Tennis: Girls | Boys | TennisReporting Track & Field: Girls | Boys | Athletic.net
2026 Baseball Rankings
Click here for OSAAtoday Baseball Articles
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 4-1 | 1 | 936.364 | 4 | 742.361 |
|
2 | 2-4 | 5 | 668.750 | 1 | 782.739 |
|
3 | 4-2 | 3 | 717.083 | 3 | 751.879 |
|
4 | 3-1 | 2 | 775.625 | 5 | 727.082 |
|
5 | 5-1 | 6 | 654.514 | 2 | 752.775 |
|
6 | 3-2 | 4 | 675.486 | 10 | 684.696 |
|
7 | 4-2 | 8 | 643.141 | 12 | 670.407 |
|
8 | 4-1 | 14 | 572.143 | 8 | 698.396 |
|
9 | 4-1 | 12 | 592.064 | 11 | 675.929 |
|
10 | 3-5 | 13 | 588.750 | 14 | 641.021 |
|
11 | 4-1 | 23 | 519.945 | 7 | 698.764 |
|
12 | 3-3 | 9 | 628.414 | 21 | 557.647 |
|
13 | 3-2 | 17 | 548.409 | 16 | 592.376 |
|
14 | 5-1 | 15 | 566.250 | 18 | 585.096 |
|
15 | 5-1 | 33 | 462.500 | 6 | 710.695 |
|
16 | 3-2 | 25 | 519.500 | 17 | 590.223 |
|
17 | 2-2 | 11 | 600.000 | 32 | 417.293 |
|
18 | 0-1 | 7 | 650.000 | 36 | 393.930 |
|
19 | 2-3 | 20 | 522.689 | 24 | 512.376 |
|
20 | 2-3 | 18 | 530.181 | 27 | 493.570 |
|
21 | 4-3 | 28 | 505.833 | 19 | 572.543 |
|
22 | 2-2-1 | 24 | 519.809 | 23 | 531.658 |
|
23 | 3-1-1 | 10 | 626.210 | 37 | 375.000 |
|
24 | 2-0 | 35 | 458.333 | 13 | 650.426 |
|
25 | 4-2 | 41 | 387.500 | 9 | 686.148 |
|
26 | 2-4 | 29 | 499.939 | 22 | 545.696 |
|
27 | 2-3 | 16 | 551.538 | 35 | 395.383 |
|
28 | 5-2 | 36 | 447.115 | 20 | 559.050 |
|
29 | 3-2-1 | 27 | 511.354 | 29 | 478.808 |
|
30 | 2-2 | 26 | 518.750 | 31 | 440.518 |
|
31 | 4-2 | 30 | 468.750 | 28 | 490.276 |
|
32 | 1-4 | 44 | 344.312 | 15 | 629.654 |
|
33 | 3-3 | 31 | 465.000 | 30 | 474.862 |
|
34 | 1-3 | 21 | 520.833 | 40 | 333.227 |
|
35 | 0-4 | 38 | 443.135 | 25 | 500.000 |
|
36 | 3-3 | 19 | 528.828 | 45 | 228.845 |
|
37 | 0-4 | 40 | 432.083 | 25 | 500.000 |
|
38 | 0-2 | 22 | 520.000 | 43 | 285.176 |
|
39 | 2-3 | 34 | 459.615 | 34 | 403.658 |
|
40 | 1-4 | 31 | 465.000 | 39 | 352.248 |
|
41 | 2-3 | 39 | 436.167 | 33 | 406.666 |
|
42 | 2-5 | 37 | 443.565 | 41 | 316.530 |
|
43 | 1-1 | 47 | 291.250 | 38 | 370.453 |
|
44 | 2-5 | 43 | 354.127 | 42 | 302.841 |
|
45 | 2-4 | 42 | 377.500 | 44 | 234.850 |
|
46 | 0-6 | 46 | 330.417 | 46 | 200.227 |
|
47 | 0-5 | 45 | 332.583 | 47 | 137.305 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 5-1 | 4 | 644.583 | 1 | 747.983 |
|
2 | 3-1 | 2 | 676.875 | 4 | 718.302 |
|
3 | 2-0 | 5 | 620.833 | 5 | 682.905 |
|
4 | 4-2 | 9 | 559.937 | 2 | 746.320 |
|
5 | 2-4 | 8 | 567.949 | 3 | 738.826 |
|
6 | 4-1 | 6 | 582.667 | 7 | 655.553 |
|
7 | 3-2 | 7 | 569.167 | 11 | 573.856 |
|
8 | 3-2 | 10 | 537.576 | 10 | 578.534 |
|
9 | 2-2 | 1 | 695.000 | 20 | 417.738 |
|
10 | 3-3 | 15 | 507.431 | 8 | 625.000 |
|
11 | 3-2 | 12 | 525.075 | 12 | 567.190 |
|
12 | 2-3 | 3 | 662.500 | 22 | 399.301 |
|
13 | 3-3 | 23 | 374.107 | 6 | 671.815 |
|
14 | 2-3 | 16 | 500.083 | 14 | 554.544 |
|
15 | 3-3 | 22 | 401.961 | 9 | 612.663 |
|
16 | 2-3-1 | 14 | 517.393 | 18 | 464.972 |
|
17 | 2-2-1 | 18 | 469.083 | 15 | 493.859 |
|
18 | 3-2 | 17 | 475.000 | 16 | 480.129 |
|
19 | 1-3-1 | 13 | 518.167 | 20 | 417.738 |
|
20 | 2-2-1 | 11 | 526.923 | 25 | 359.511 |
|
21 | 4-2 | 21 | 411.256 | 17 | 477.533 |
|
22 | 1-1 | 20 | 432.500 | 19 | 429.066 |
|
23 | 3-2 | 28 | 242.308 | 13 | 562.829 |
|
24 | 0-6 | 19 | 455.000 | 27 | 349.196 |
|
25 | 2-2 | 25 | 356.117 | 23 | 397.501 |
|
26 | 1-4 | 24 | 357.489 | 28 | 315.702 |
|
27 | 1-3 | 27 | 283.611 | 26 | 349.288 |
|
28 | 1-2 | 30 | 160.000 | 24 | 389.871 |
|
29 | 0-3 | 26 | 310.556 | 32 | 174.536 |
|
30 | 0-4 | 29 | 216.667 | 30 | 307.314 |
|
31 | 0-1 | 33 | 0.000 | 29 | 309.689 |
|
32 | 0-5 | 31 | 108.333 | 31 | 268.860 |
|
33 | 0-4 | 32 | 67.708 | 33 | 80.570 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 4-0 | 2 | 891.667 | 1 | 813.291 |
|
2 | 5-1 | 1 | 953.333 | 4 | 807.429 |
|
3 | 4-0 | 6 | 634.375 | 2 | 812.397 |
|
4 | 5-1 | 5 | 641.015 | 5 | 743.052 |
|
5 | 6-1 | 8 | 575.754 | 3 | 811.237 |
|
6 | 4-2 | 7 | 612.500 | 7 | 732.287 |
|
7 | 3-2 | 4 | 686.667 | 10 | 577.789 |
|
8 | 1-2 | 3 | 713.333 | 14 | 505.559 |
|
9 | 3-0 | 12 | 530.556 | 6 | 739.832 |
|
10 | 4-2 | 10 | 563.697 | 8 | 615.669 |
|
11 | 3-2 | 9 | 570.333 | 11 | 576.095 |
|
12 | 1-3-1 | 16 | 490.000 | 9 | 609.598 |
|
13 | 5-1 | 15 | 504.902 | 12 | 555.676 |
|
14 | 3-3 | 14 | 516.250 | 13 | 515.989 |
|
15 | 2-2 | 13 | 521.667 | 15 | 465.044 |
|
16 | 2-6 | 11 | 550.455 | 21 | 396.509 |
|
17 | 2-3 | 17 | 489.026 | 17 | 442.714 |
|
18 | 2-3 | 20 | 478.333 | 18 | 427.960 |
|
19 | 3-2 | 23 | 461.061 | 16 | 456.133 |
|
20 | 0-2 | 18 | 487.500 | 22 | 386.226 |
|
21 | 1-3 | 21 | 477.500 | 20 | 415.063 |
|
22 | 1-3 | 19 | 478.750 | 24 | 382.011 |
|
23 | 2-2 | 28 | 413.333 | 19 | 423.588 |
|
24 | 2-4 | 25 | 444.861 | 23 | 385.987 |
|
25 | 3-3 | 22 | 462.623 | 26 | 372.218 |
|
26 | 1-4 | 24 | 447.167 | 27 | 361.596 |
|
27 | 1-2 | 27 | 425.000 | 25 | 375.000 |
|
28 | 0-3 | 26 | 433.333 | 28 | 248.489 |
|
29 | 0-5 | 30 | 238.333 | 29 | 241.097 |
|
30 | 1-7 | 29 | 318.333 | 30 | 121.249 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 4-0 | 2 | 769.792 | 1 | 878.175 |
|
2 | 3-1 | 1 | 773.125 | 6 | 734.357 |
|
3 | 2-1 | 6 | 652.083 | 3 | 758.319 |
|
4 | 5-1 | 10 | 621.314 | 2 | 758.700 |
|
5 | 3-0 | 8 | 638.889 | 4 | 743.595 |
|
6 | 5-1 | 9 | 636.458 | 5 | 739.092 |
|
7 | 1-0 | 4 | 675.000 | 11 | 631.919 |
|
8 | 2-1 | 7 | 640.000 | 9 | 668.546 |
|
9 | 1-0 | 4 | 675.000 | 12 | 625.000 |
|
10 | 3-1 | 12 | 601.042 | 13 | 613.850 |
|
11 | 4-1 | 19 | 481.500 | 7 | 688.563 |
|
12 | 1-3 | 3 | 755.000 | 25 | 442.139 |
|
13 | 3-3 | 13 | 593.889 | 19 | 528.727 |
|
14 | 2-1 | 17 | 522.222 | 16 | 569.385 |
|
15 | 3-2 | 15 | 541.909 | 18 | 531.620 |
|
16 | 2-4 | 29 | 409.736 | 8 | 670.712 |
|
17 | 1-2 | 14 | 583.333 | 26 | 428.477 |
|
18 | 5-1 | 28 | 411.667 | 14 | 601.672 |
|
19 | 3-2 | 22 | 457.000 | 20 | 527.728 |
|
20 | 0-3 | 11 | 613.889 | 31 | 380.461 |
|
21 | 2-0 | 34 | 350.000 | 10 | 658.296 |
|
22 | 3-2 | 27 | 420.295 | 17 | 535.989 |
|
23 | 3-2 | 24 | 449.385 | 21 | 510.901 |
|
24 | 3-3 | 23 | 453.958 | 22 | 505.274 |
|
25 | 1-3 | 18 | 484.028 | 29 | 408.908 |
|
26 | 4-2 | 33 | 362.500 | 15 | 572.259 |
|
27 | 1-4 | 20 | 470.970 | 32 | 368.625 |
|
28 | 2-2 | 16 | 541.155 | 36 | 339.907 |
|
29 | 2-4 | 30 | 401.250 | 24 | 481.699 |
|
30 | 1-3 | 21 | 457.292 | 34 | 355.918 |
|
31 | 2-3 | 26 | 425.333 | 30 | 395.757 |
|
32 | 1-4 | 25 | 434.000 | 33 | 360.970 |
|
33 | 2-4 | 31 | 392.917 | 28 | 414.048 |
|
34 | 0-2 | 41 | 0.000 | 23 | 500.000 |
|
35 | 2-3 | 37 | 315.833 | 27 | 420.458 |
|
36 | 0-4 | 32 | 379.167 | 41 | 194.866 |
|
37 | 1-2 | 39 | 239.583 | 35 | 343.130 |
|
38 | 1-5 | 36 | 316.597 | 39 | 268.801 |
|
39 | 1-3 | 38 | 268.788 | 38 | 269.229 |
|
40 | 0-4 | 35 | 325.000 | 42 | 176.229 |
|
41 | 0-1 | 41 | 0.000 | 37 | 318.661 |
|
42 | 0-2 | 40 | 189.583 | 40 | 212.383 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 3-0 | 1 | 945.833 | 2 | 830.123 |
|
2 | 6-0 | 5 | 718.333 | 1 | 861.931 |
|
3 | 3-0 | 4 | 729.167 | 3 | 828.327 |
|
4 | 4-0 | 3 | 742.708 | 4 | 818.521 |
|
5 | 2-0 | 2 | 756.250 | 5 | 773.729 |
|
6 | 2-0 | 8 | 675.000 | 6 | 718.590 |
|
7 | 1-0 | 8 | 675.000 | 9 | 625.000 |
|
8 | 1-1 | 6 | 697.500 | 11 | 578.950 |
|
9 | 3-2 | 10 | 659.167 | 8 | 626.751 |
|
10 | 1-3 | 16 | 575.000 | 10 | 624.976 |
|
11 | 4-3 | 14 | 587.582 | 12 | 576.628 |
|
12 | 2-2 | 11 | 654.583 | 15 | 560.086 |
|
13 | 1-2 | 7 | 691.667 | 22 | 468.165 |
|
14 | 2-1 | 13 | 608.889 | 18 | 529.625 |
|
15 | 2-1 | 20 | 525.000 | 14 | 560.373 |
|
16 | 2-2 | 18 | 561.806 | 16 | 552.169 |
|
17 | 4-3 | 23 | 492.187 | 13 | 572.110 |
|
18 | 3-2 | 19 | 535.000 | 17 | 546.275 |
|
19 | 5-1 | 31 | 381.111 | 7 | 642.661 |
|
20 | 0-1 | 12 | 650.000 | 27 | 406.197 |
|
21 | 1-3 | 16 | 575.000 | 24 | 451.163 |
|
22 | 1-2 | 15 | 583.333 | 25 | 437.337 |
|
23 | 2-3 | 25 | 483.833 | 21 | 468.561 |
|
24 | 1-1 | 27 | 432.500 | 20 | 474.798 |
|
25 | 3-1 | 32 | 370.833 | 19 | 501.417 |
|
26 | 2-2 | 28 | 418.750 | 23 | 462.524 |
|
27 | 1-3 | 22 | 495.000 | 29 | 394.065 |
|
28 | 0-2 | 24 | 487.500 | 28 | 396.349 |
|
29 | 0-1 | 21 | 520.000 | 31 | 385.652 |
|
30 | 2-2 | 29 | 388.958 | 30 | 392.367 |
|
31 | 1-3 | 33 | 354.028 | 31 | 385.652 |
|
32 | 1-5 | 39 | 313.750 | 26 | 424.489 |
|
33 | 0-3 | 26 | 444.167 | 39 | 277.832 |
|
34 | 0-1 | 34 | 325.000 | 33 | 375.000 |
|
34 | 0-1 | 34 | 325.000 | 33 | 375.000 |
|
36 | 1-1 | 34 | 325.000 | 36 | 348.758 |
|
37 | 0-1 | 34 | 325.000 | 37 | 343.634 |
|
38 | 1-4 | 30 | 381.875 | 41 | 237.690 |
|
39 | 0-2 | 34 | 325.000 | 38 | 287.650 |
|
40 | 1-2 | 42 | 222.222 | 35 | 374.928 |
|
41 | 0-2 | 40 | 297.917 | 42 | 200.866 |
|
42 | 0-2 | 43 | 216.667 | 40 | 265.452 |
|
43 | 0-4 | 41 | 243.750 | 43 | 189.578 |
|
44 | 0-4 | 44 | 162.500 | 44 | 163.260 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
