Spring Individual Sports Schedules
Golf: Girls | Boys | iWanamaker Tennis: Girls | Boys | TennisReporting Track & Field: Girls | Boys | Athletic.net
Golf: Girls | Boys | iWanamaker Tennis: Girls | Boys | TennisReporting Track & Field: Girls | Boys | Athletic.net
2026 Baseball Rankings
Click here for OSAAtoday Baseball Articles
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 4-1 | 1 | 936.364 | 4 | 741.926 |
|
2 | 4-2 | 4 | 717.083 | 2 | 754.922 |
|
3 | 2-4 | 6 | 668.750 | 1 | 782.789 |
|
4 | 3-1 | 3 | 775.625 | 5 | 725.778 |
|
5 | 5-1 | 7 | 668.056 | 3 | 752.805 |
|
6 | 3-2 | 5 | 675.486 | 10 | 684.626 |
|
7 | 4-2 | 8 | 655.780 | 11 | 663.800 |
|
8 | 3-2 | 2 | 789.167 | 21 | 558.411 |
|
9 | 3-5 | 13 | 595.521 | 12 | 654.065 |
|
10 | 4-1 | 17 | 550.476 | 9 | 684.998 |
|
11 | 5-1 | 9 | 615.000 | 17 | 585.300 |
|
12 | 4-1 | 20 | 530.778 | 7 | 709.959 |
|
13 | 1-0 | 15 | 566.667 | 15 | 604.103 |
|
14 | 3-2 | 14 | 567.167 | 16 | 601.379 |
|
15 | 3-1 | 19 | 536.212 | 14 | 608.884 |
|
16 | 5-1 | 32 | 462.500 | 6 | 714.265 |
|
17 | 4-2 | 10 | 604.167 | 28 | 484.241 |
|
18 | 3-2 | 22 | 526.742 | 18 | 580.971 |
|
19 | 2-3 | 18 | 541.015 | 25 | 506.890 |
|
20 | 2-2 | 11 | 600.000 | 33 | 418.307 |
|
21 | 4-3 | 28 | 487.083 | 19 | 569.674 |
|
22 | 2-3 | 23 | 522.689 | 24 | 512.195 |
|
23 | 2-1-1 | 12 | 595.528 | 35 | 375.000 |
|
24 | 4-2 | 40 | 387.500 | 8 | 686.410 |
|
25 | 2-4 | 26 | 499.939 | 22 | 543.999 |
|
26 | 2-2-1 | 25 | 511.142 | 23 | 530.888 |
|
27 | 2-3 | 16 | 551.538 | 34 | 395.470 |
|
28 | 5-2 | 31 | 462.591 | 20 | 564.683 |
|
29 | 1-4 | 43 | 344.312 | 13 | 630.043 |
|
30 | 3-2-1 | 27 | 498.354 | 29 | 478.664 |
|
31 | 2-2 | 24 | 518.750 | 32 | 440.369 |
|
32 | 0-4 | 33 | 443.135 | 26 | 500.000 |
|
33 | 3-3 | 30 | 465.000 | 30 | 474.470 |
|
34 | 0-4 | 35 | 432.083 | 26 | 500.000 |
|
35 | 1-3 | 29 | 477.778 | 37 | 371.102 |
|
36 | 3-3 | 21 | 528.828 | 45 | 228.710 |
|
37 | 2-2 | 37 | 427.361 | 31 | 442.328 |
|
38 | 1-4 | 36 | 430.333 | 39 | 338.819 |
|
39 | 1-3 | 34 | 435.625 | 41 | 326.133 |
|
40 | 0-1 | 39 | 390.000 | 40 | 328.080 |
|
41 | 2-5 | 38 | 406.422 | 42 | 312.308 |
|
42 | 0-1 | 46 | 325.000 | 35 | 375.000 |
|
43 | 1-1 | 47 | 210.000 | 38 | 352.006 |
|
44 | 2-5 | 42 | 369.603 | 43 | 306.898 |
|
45 | 2-4 | 41 | 377.500 | 44 | 234.758 |
|
46 | 0-6 | 44 | 334.028 | 46 | 198.365 |
|
47 | 0-5 | 45 | 332.583 | 47 | 140.109 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 3-1 | 2 | 676.875 | 4 | 718.264 |
|
2 | 4-1 | 5 | 644.833 | 3 | 725.601 |
|
3 | 4-2 | 9 | 559.937 | 1 | 749.643 |
|
4 | 2-4 | 8 | 567.949 | 2 | 740.406 |
|
5 | 2-0 | 3 | 675.000 | 8 | 625.000 |
|
6 | 4-1 | 6 | 595.667 | 6 | 658.096 |
|
7 | 3-1 | 7 | 577.917 | 7 | 638.142 |
|
8 | 2-2 | 1 | 695.000 | 20 | 417.739 |
|
9 | 3-3 | 14 | 502.917 | 8 | 625.000 |
|
10 | 3-2 | 12 | 521.326 | 11 | 578.540 |
|
11 | 3-2 | 11 | 524.135 | 12 | 567.323 |
|
12 | 2-3 | 4 | 662.500 | 23 | 394.791 |
|
13 | 3-3 | 24 | 374.107 | 5 | 669.224 |
|
14 | 2-3 | 15 | 500.083 | 14 | 554.334 |
|
15 | 3-2 | 20 | 441.667 | 10 | 611.319 |
|
16 | 1-2-1 | 10 | 549.034 | 20 | 417.739 |
|
17 | 2-3-1 | 13 | 517.393 | 18 | 464.972 |
|
18 | 2-2-1 | 18 | 469.083 | 15 | 494.182 |
|
19 | 3-2 | 17 | 475.000 | 17 | 480.578 |
|
20 | 4-2 | 22 | 411.256 | 16 | 490.702 |
|
21 | 1-1 | 21 | 432.500 | 19 | 429.037 |
|
22 | 3-2 | 28 | 242.308 | 13 | 562.131 |
|
23 | 1-2-1 | 16 | 482.500 | 26 | 359.513 |
|
24 | 0-6 | 19 | 455.000 | 27 | 350.154 |
|
25 | 2-2 | 25 | 356.117 | 22 | 396.941 |
|
26 | 1-3 | 23 | 408.929 | 24 | 392.714 |
|
27 | 1-2 | 30 | 160.000 | 25 | 390.710 |
|
28 | 1-3 | 27 | 283.611 | 28 | 349.532 |
|
29 | 0-3 | 26 | 310.556 | 32 | 180.355 |
|
30 | 0-4 | 29 | 216.667 | 30 | 307.403 |
|
31 | 0-1 | 33 | 0.000 | 29 | 309.679 |
|
32 | 0-5 | 31 | 108.333 | 31 | 269.825 |
|
33 | 0-4 | 32 | 81.250 | 33 | 82.908 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 4-1 | 1 | 946.154 | 2 | 807.158 |
|
2 | 4-0 | 2 | 891.667 | 3 | 798.509 |
|
3 | 6-1 | 7 | 591.230 | 1 | 818.471 |
|
4 | 4-2 | 6 | 612.500 | 5 | 732.305 |
|
5 | 5-1 | 5 | 630.182 | 7 | 729.062 |
|
6 | 3-2 | 4 | 686.667 | 12 | 561.351 |
|
7 | 3-0 | 13 | 530.556 | 4 | 737.305 |
|
8 | 1-2 | 3 | 713.333 | 14 | 509.152 |
|
9 | 3-2 | 8 | 570.333 | 10 | 580.495 |
|
10 | 4-2 | 11 | 547.447 | 9 | 603.926 |
|
11 | 3-0 | 15 | 512.500 | 6 | 729.721 |
|
12 | 2-2 | 9 | 551.667 | 13 | 523.143 |
|
13 | 5-1 | 12 | 541.013 | 11 | 576.148 |
|
14 | 1-3-1 | 16 | 490.000 | 8 | 609.530 |
|
15 | 2-2 | 14 | 521.667 | 16 | 461.746 |
|
16 | 2-6 | 10 | 550.455 | 22 | 395.393 |
|
17 | 2-3 | 20 | 465.273 | 17 | 444.200 |
|
18 | 2-3 | 19 | 478.333 | 18 | 430.298 |
|
19 | 3-2 | 23 | 461.061 | 15 | 462.227 |
|
20 | 0-2 | 17 | 487.500 | 23 | 384.560 |
|
21 | 1-3 | 22 | 461.250 | 20 | 396.852 |
|
22 | 1-3 | 18 | 478.750 | 24 | 379.230 |
|
23 | 2-4 | 24 | 453.889 | 21 | 395.799 |
|
24 | 3-3 | 21 | 462.623 | 25 | 375.219 |
|
25 | 2-2 | 28 | 413.333 | 19 | 420.069 |
|
26 | 1-2 | 27 | 425.000 | 26 | 375.000 |
|
27 | 1-4 | 26 | 427.667 | 27 | 349.327 |
|
28 | 0-3 | 25 | 433.333 | 29 | 230.156 |
|
29 | 0-5 | 30 | 238.333 | 28 | 242.982 |
|
30 | 1-7 | 29 | 318.333 | 30 | 120.139 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 3-0 | 1 | 837.500 | 2 | 832.257 |
|
2 | 4-0 | 3 | 769.792 | 1 | 873.488 |
|
3 | 3-0 | 5 | 675.000 | 3 | 765.597 |
|
4 | 1-1 | 2 | 825.000 | 7 | 687.763 |
|
5 | 5-1 | 8 | 672.569 | 5 | 756.265 |
|
6 | 5-1 | 10 | 615.897 | 4 | 758.756 |
|
7 | 1-0 | 5 | 675.000 | 11 | 636.334 |
|
8 | 1-0 | 5 | 675.000 | 12 | 625.000 |
|
9 | 2-1 | 9 | 629.167 | 9 | 669.240 |
|
10 | 3-1 | 12 | 601.042 | 13 | 620.494 |
|
11 | 4-1 | 21 | 481.500 | 6 | 694.454 |
|
12 | 1-3 | 4 | 755.000 | 26 | 447.498 |
|
13 | 2-1 | 18 | 522.222 | 16 | 565.394 |
|
14 | 3-2 | 16 | 541.909 | 18 | 531.766 |
|
15 | 3-3 | 14 | 575.833 | 20 | 516.341 |
|
16 | 2-4 | 29 | 409.736 | 8 | 672.342 |
|
17 | 5-1 | 25 | 448.864 | 15 | 572.463 |
|
18 | 1-2 | 15 | 544.167 | 25 | 458.077 |
|
19 | 1-2 | 13 | 583.333 | 27 | 438.321 |
|
20 | 3-2 | 22 | 457.000 | 19 | 527.966 |
|
21 | 2-0 | 33 | 350.000 | 10 | 652.379 |
|
22 | 3-2 | 28 | 420.295 | 17 | 539.237 |
|
23 | 3-2 | 24 | 449.385 | 21 | 516.329 |
|
24 | 3-3 | 23 | 453.958 | 22 | 505.385 |
|
25 | 0-3 | 11 | 613.889 | 34 | 361.019 |
|
26 | 4-2 | 32 | 362.500 | 14 | 576.036 |
|
27 | 1-3 | 20 | 484.028 | 30 | 409.087 |
|
28 | 1-4 | 19 | 514.303 | 32 | 388.323 |
|
29 | 2-2 | 17 | 541.155 | 36 | 341.067 |
|
30 | 2-4 | 30 | 401.250 | 24 | 482.765 |
|
31 | 2-3 | 26 | 436.167 | 31 | 409.001 |
|
32 | 2-4 | 31 | 392.917 | 29 | 417.037 |
|
33 | 1-4 | 27 | 434.000 | 33 | 373.150 |
|
34 | 2-3 | 35 | 315.833 | 28 | 421.407 |
|
35 | 0-2 | 41 | 0.000 | 23 | 500.000 |
|
36 | 1-5 | 34 | 316.597 | 38 | 272.329 |
|
37 | 1-2 | 38 | 261.250 | 35 | 346.274 |
|
38 | 1-3 | 37 | 268.788 | 39 | 264.758 |
|
39 | 0-1 | 41 | 0.000 | 37 | 318.671 |
|
40 | 0-4 | 36 | 297.917 | 42 | 186.378 |
|
41 | 0-4 | 40 | 162.500 | 40 | 215.651 |
|
42 | 0-2 | 39 | 189.583 | 41 | 213.185 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 3-0 | 3 | 783.333 | 2 | 843.905 |
|
2 | 4-0 | 2 | 905.208 | 3 | 836.172 |
|
3 | 3-0 | 1 | 945.833 | 4 | 830.793 |
|
4 | 6-0 | 5 | 718.333 | 1 | 861.206 |
|
5 | 2-0 | 7 | 675.000 | 5 | 711.216 |
|
6 | 3-2 | 6 | 678.472 | 6 | 695.371 |
|
7 | 2-0 | 7 | 675.000 | 8 | 647.042 |
|
8 | 1-1 | 4 | 751.667 | 11 | 597.552 |
|
9 | 1-0 | 7 | 675.000 | 9 | 625.000 |
|
10 | 4-2 | 13 | 617.778 | 12 | 577.730 |
|
11 | 1-3 | 17 | 575.000 | 10 | 623.700 |
|
12 | 2-2 | 12 | 627.500 | 17 | 538.104 |
|
13 | 1-2 | 10 | 658.333 | 20 | 501.217 |
|
14 | 2-2 | 18 | 561.806 | 14 | 552.229 |
|
15 | 2-1 | 14 | 608.889 | 18 | 526.696 |
|
16 | 3-2 | 19 | 535.000 | 15 | 549.507 |
|
17 | 4-3 | 22 | 504.568 | 13 | 576.184 |
|
18 | 5-1 | 31 | 399.167 | 7 | 656.440 |
|
19 | 0-1 | 11 | 650.000 | 27 | 403.739 |
|
20 | 1-2 | 15 | 583.333 | 24 | 441.126 |
|
21 | 1-2 | 15 | 583.333 | 25 | 439.316 |
|
22 | 2-3 | 21 | 505.500 | 21 | 479.594 |
|
23 | 2-1 | 28 | 416.667 | 16 | 541.009 |
|
24 | 3-1 | 27 | 425.000 | 19 | 501.509 |
|
25 | 1-1 | 26 | 432.500 | 22 | 474.844 |
|
26 | 2-2 | 25 | 435.000 | 23 | 465.091 |
|
27 | 0-1 | 20 | 520.000 | 30 | 385.836 |
|
28 | 0-2 | 24 | 487.500 | 28 | 398.279 |
|
29 | 1-3 | 23 | 495.000 | 29 | 393.795 |
|
30 | 1-3 | 32 | 354.028 | 30 | 385.836 |
|
31 | 1-5 | 38 | 313.750 | 26 | 425.143 |
|
32 | 0-1 | 33 | 325.000 | 32 | 375.000 |
|
32 | 0-1 | 33 | 325.000 | 32 | 375.000 |
|
34 | 0-3 | 29 | 415.278 | 38 | 278.696 |
|
35 | 1-1 | 33 | 325.000 | 35 | 349.836 |
|
36 | 0-1 | 33 | 325.000 | 36 | 343.644 |
|
37 | 0-2 | 33 | 325.000 | 37 | 288.539 |
|
38 | 1-4 | 30 | 408.958 | 41 | 251.177 |
|
39 | 1-2 | 42 | 222.222 | 34 | 371.099 |
|
40 | 1-2 | 39 | 313.056 | 39 | 267.375 |
|
41 | 0-2 | 40 | 297.917 | 42 | 200.638 |
|
42 | 0-2 | 43 | 216.667 | 40 | 265.466 |
|
43 | 0-4 | 41 | 243.750 | 43 | 193.689 |
|
44 | 0-4 | 44 | 162.500 | 44 | 164.875 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
